PUBLICLY AVAILABLE FREQUENCY DATABASES
The Foundation of Our Knowledge: Global References
In our scientific analysis of physical vibration models, we are not reinventing the wheel. To ensure thorough documentation, we draw on a solid foundation of publicly accessible, globally established frequency databases. These sources have served as a reliable gold standard for researchers and therapists for decades.
An Overview of the Most Important Databases
Original Royal Rife Frequencies (MOR):
The historical foundation of all modern databases. In the 1930s, Dr. Royal Raymond Rife defined the so-called “Mortal Oscillatory Rates,” which laid the absolute foundation for frequency and resonance research.
➔ On Historical Research into Rife
Bioresonance according to Paul Schmidt:
An indispensable standard, particularly in Europe. These frequency spectra, based on decades of empirical studies, focus specifically on identifying energetic causes and promoting harmonization.
➔ About Paul Schmidt’s research
Hulda Clark Frequency Lists:
These lists are based on the pioneering work of Dr. Hulda Clark. Her identification of specific resonance ranges for pathogens remains an integral part of many databases to this day.
➔ Information about Dr. Hulda Clark
James Bare Frequency Lists:
James Bare is a prominent figure in frequency research. His work forms an important pillar of modern frequency application and interference research.
➔ About Rife-Bare Research
CAFL & NCFL (Consolidated Annotated Frequency List):
Compiled by Brian McInturff, the CAFL is one of the most widely used references worldwide. It offers a comprehensive collection covering a wide range of states.
➔ Go to the CAFL database
ETDFL (Electro-Therapy Device Frequency List):
One of the most comprehensive databases of our time, with over 8,000 references. It is based on international biophysical studies and empirical research findings.
➔ Visit the ETDFL website
Spooky2 Frequency Compilation:
One of the world’s largest and most actively maintained open-source databases. It combines CAFL, ETDFL, PROV (clinically proven frequencies), and specialist lists into a massive, constantly updated dataset of over 35,000 entries.
➔ Go to the Spooky2 database
The Direct Signature: The Clarity of Frequency Logic
In the documentation, you will often come across frequency values expressed as clear, absolute numbers, such as 3,000 Hz. Instead of relying on complex formulas or nested calculations, we deliberately opt for this straightforward presentation. There are three key reasons for this:
1. Direct and Error-Free Applicability
In practical applications, a frequency must be immediately and directly identifiable. Specifying it as an absolute value in hertz (e.g., 3,000 Hz) provides an unambiguous target value. This eliminates the need for tedious calculations and prevents transmission errors from the outset.
2. Precise Resonance Windows
Biological resonance is extremely precise. A biological target often “resonates” at very specific, pinpoint values. Specifying the frequency in hertz ensures that the exact resonance window required is targeted, exactly as determined by research—purely and without any room for interpretation.
3. Global Standardization
Major, reliable international databases predominantly use these clear, absolute frequency values. Expressing frequencies directly in hertz makes it possible to seamlessly compare values globally and adopt findings directly without cumbersome conversions.
In summary: Expressing frequency as a clear Hertz value is the most direct form of frequency signature. It avoids unnecessary complexity and focuses on what matters most: precise, immediately actionable information for practical use.
Application in Research:
Modern frequency technologies rely on these databases as a solid foundation. However, it is important to note that in day-to-day documentation, these frequencies are often analyzed on a case-by-case basis to tailor them precisely to the scientific question at hand.
Knowledge brings peace of mind — for documentation based on experience and science.
